Ramanujan

Srinivasa Ramanujan is one of the most fascinating figures in the history of mathematics. Born in a small village in British-ruled India, he rose to prominence through sheer brilliance and an extraordinary ability to conjure profound mathematical results. Without formal training, Ramanujan managed to uncover the depths of mathematical truths that continue to inspire generations. For someone like me, pursuing a major in mathematics and questioning the boundaries of human capability, his story serves as both a beacon of inspiration and a source of intellectual debate.

Ramanujan’s work spans across number theory, continued fractions, and infinite series, among other areas. His notebooks—filled with formulas and conjectures—are still being studied today for their untapped potential. One of his most famous achievements is the infinite series for 1/π, which combines elegance with astonishing utility. His collaborations with G.H. Hardy at Cambridge University led to groundbreaking advancements, including the partition function and the Hardy-Ramanujan asymptotic formula. Hardy, a staunch atheist like myself, recognized Ramanujan as a mathematical genius of the highest order and described their collaboration as one of the most fruitful experiences of his life.

Yet, there is an element of Ramanujan’s journey that I grapple with: his unwavering belief that his mathematical insights were divinely inspired. He attributed his discoveries to the goddess Namagiri, often stating that his results came to him in dreams or through divine revelation. While I deeply respect his devotion, as an atheist, I view his genius as a testament to the capabilities of the human mind rather than the intervention of a higher power. To me, attributing his achievements to divinity diminishes the intellectual labour and creativity he brought to his work.

G.H Hardy

G.H. Hardy’s perspective on Ramanujan’s genius resonates with me. Hardy believed that mathematics was a purely human endeavour—a universal language born from the logical constructs of our minds. Despite their differing worldviews, Hardy and Ramanujan’s partnership thrived, demonstrating how mutual respect and collaboration can transcend ideological divides.

What I find most inspiring about Ramanujan is his resilience and originality. His life reminds me that even the most unassuming beginnings can lead to monumental achievements if one is driven by curiosity and dedication.

Ramanujan’s work pushes me to explore the limits of mathematical thought. His life also challenges me to remain humble, to embrace collaboration, and to find beauty in the abstract. While I may not share his belief in divine guidance, I share his passion for uncovering truths that lie beyond the ordinary. That shared passion, for me, is the most sacred bond of all.